How to translate text using browser tools
1 February 2003 Secondary Reactive Oxygen Species Extend the Range of Photosensitization Effects in Cells: DNA Damage Produced Via Initial Membrane Photosensitization
Gladys D. Ouédraogo, Robert W. Redmond
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The type-II photosensitization process is mediated by the formation of singlet oxygen (O2g]). The short lifetime of this species dictates that chemical reactions with biological substrates can only occur when O2g) is in very close proximity to the photosensitizer itself. In this study, deuteroporphyrin, a type-II, membrane-localized photosensitizer, was used to generate O2g) in human lymphoblast WTK-1 cells, and the range of influence was determined by a variety of biological assays. Surprisingly, the initial membrane-confined events were shown, by comet assay, to induce DNA damage in these cells. DNA damage was inhibited both by membrane-localized (α-tocopherol acetate) and by cytoplasmic (trolox) free radical scavengers. Comet formation also was inhibited by treatment at low temperature. DNA fragmentation was not influenced by treatment with the pan-caspase inhibitor, benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethylketone, showing that apoptosis was not responsible for fragmentation. Taken together, these results show that primary photosensitization reactions involving O2g), even when tightly confined in extranuclear locations, leads to the production of secondary reactive oxygen species, probably as a result of lipid peroxidation, that can act at greater distances from the photosensitizer itself. These experiments were carried out under conditions where cell survival was significant and raise questions regarding DNA damage and mutagenesis pathways, even when extranuclear O2g)-generating compounds are used.

Gladys D. Ouédraogo and Robert W. Redmond "Secondary Reactive Oxygen Species Extend the Range of Photosensitization Effects in Cells: DNA Damage Produced Via Initial Membrane Photosensitization," Photochemistry and Photobiology 77(2), 192-203, (1 February 2003). https://doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2003)077<0192:SROSET>2.0.CO;2
Received: 4 September 2002; Accepted: 1 November 2002; Published: 1 February 2003
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top